Likewise, in the article, the idea of fixing society's well being through production was discussed. Our society produces too much waste and needs to start producing more environmentally efficient means of production. He states at the end, "Ethical considerations cannot be avoided in determining the discount rate", and how climate change has to do exactly with ethics. This concept is confusing to me and the only thing I got out of the article was to stop producing waste, which by now is a given, obvious fact.
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
"The Ethics of Climate Change"
John Broome's article "The Ethics of Climate Change" is obviously about climate change. Ethics was used to describe ways to face the issue of global warming. The article's thesis is how to compensate people for bad things that are being done to the environment. It is up to us to handle ways to fix this issue, instead of wasting time using ethics to think of creative ways. The author of the article writes about prioritarianism, giving priority to the less well off. I don't understand what this had to do with the article and how the richer future section of this article had anything to do with climate change. Honestly, this article confuses me.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(43)
-
▼
April
(20)
- Pantene Commercial
- "Just Add Water" & "Animacules*
- What is the same about Twn & Just Add Water??
- Animacules and Other Little Subjects
- George Carlin
- What emblem/image/symbol best exemplifies the film...
- "How We Evolve"- Benjamin Phelan
- INFER:How do we stop global warming and climate ch...
- The Way I Feel About Blogging
- Reverse Outline "John Broome's Article- "The Ethic...
- "The Ethics of Climate Change"
- "Big Foot"- Michael Specter
- Just Add Water
- What is a Writer!? AM I A WRITER?
- Writing Center !!!!!!
- "The Reality Tests"
- Faustian Economics
- gReEd iS....
- Jacques Derrida
- Poems by R. Jones and R. Hass
-
▼
April
(20)
About Me
- Ariel A.
- Student at Hofstra University
Hi Ariel, Above you remark:
ReplyDelete"Honestly, this article confuses me."
This is actually very productive. The Harvard Writer's Guide recommends that writers "Pick the thing you don't understand and write about that." We have done this already with TwN, yes? So, here is a perfect opportunity. Comb through the article; copy down a particularly difficult passage; apply pressure and heat to push your intellect to its boundaries. Then write. Don't give up.
I hated this article completely. It was a waste for this author to ever have written it since he offers no help or insight as to how to help stop global warming. I've read about 3 articles in the pst 2 days about global warming and this one is by far the worst. Every other one at least provided something worth thinking about. All this article made me think about was closing the book.
ReplyDelete